Interesting that One would expect such a proud, lettered Gentleman to know how to spell the past participle of the verb to lead. Lead is either the present tense of the verb to lead, something for walking Dogs with, or a kind of soft metal often used for roofing Churches. I have eventually interpreted this as meaning that the Lawyer(s) in question had overheard some gossip attending the disappearance of a wrought Iron Gate from a neighbour's premises which had as far as I recall it taken place at about this time. When I first heard about it I thought that maybe some of the young students next door had been having a practical joke. I have been at some pains to explain the reasons why it seems that lot of misleading fake political feelgood propaganda has attended my household over the years and I did make an attempt of sorts to spell this out along with seeking to pose certain relevant questions in letters to a Circuit Judge as soon as I was moving into this address. This was initially mostly with regard to the fact of not managing to get serious matters across to the Constabulary and I felt it was surely quite arguable that I had been quite unwillingly in many respects the focus of such contradictory feelgood stories as different local Politicians tried to find things to talk about in the build up to the General Election in 2009-10. I unfortunately do suppose that an acquaintance of an acquaintance whom I know little about has to be viewed as Prime Suspect and I suppose on balance it had to be someone with a Truck or Van as the Gate in question was too heavy to be carried off.

I had lived on a busy thoroughfare between three Housing Estates and someone had made an attempt to batter down the door of the Bookmaker's downstairs over that winter, things had regularly been stolen from outside and I had to keep a camera trained on the Bike 24/7 even though it was right outside the front door. What is of trying to put it that it was a generally miscued sort of suggestion that had led to Mr Thorpe having felt he was unwelcome to call when I was thinking of trying to avoid being unsociable and unhelpful in attending the gossip of a busy neighbourhood and in having been subsequently murdered. As I say I think this was clearly one of those situations when a little insightful assistance could have done much for Mr Thorpe and his family. As far as I could work out his Wife had kicked him and three children out for a new Partner at about the time his industrial injuries money had run out and he was sleeping on the floor of a retired cripple nearby with his fourteen yr old daughter and others. When he did eventually get a house to rent in the neighbourhood I could see he could really could have done with some help in trying to make it work. His children were all roughly in their mid teens and susceptible to all sorts of suggestions about social realities, without it seemed some clear kind of lead in seeking to confront difficulties on a daily basis: it is a vast understatement to say I'm still having the utmost difficulty in crediting what has been related to me about their misfortunes.

In view of this, I consider it a perfectly logical comment, to suggest that I may reasonably withdraw any statement made since I was helped out of the Pub.

This an email I sent to the local Courthouse on March 3rd this year in connection with an Ombudsman's Investigation into the Conduct of my Solicitors and I'm sorry to have to say that I am still waiting for a reasonable response.

Witness Statements

Should have the rest of them up here soon. Suffice it to say that the descriptions given were entirely inaccurate because they were making up a story on the spur of the moment and couldn't remember anything much except the key points of the fiction they were trying to put over. The first whose statement was taken was that of Mr Ward and he obviously had the best idea of what had actually happened being the first person I spoke to at the Bar. The first major deceit he was concerned to put over was that I was clearly aware of being asked to leave at some point which I was not, and the second was that the Landlady hadn't hysterically assaulted me which she had.

This refers to the fact that my complaint was counted out within three weeks. It is alleged that this means I failed to co-operate with an investigation. It's no surprise that this kind of disgraceful malicious evasion presaged nationwide riots and a significant number of complaints to the effect that the IPCC is not fit for purpose. The Police gave a completely different story to the CPS than that which was accepted by myself and the Duty Solicitor. It's a simple fact and I don't understand how it could be the case that this should necessitate my corresponding on the subject: as far as I'm concerned that, is in itself criminal behaviour.